Blog

A Choice Between Two Futures — Part 2


[This is Part 2 of 3 — Click here to read Part 1: Part 1]

As I explained in Part 1, this series of posts is specifically addressed to Christians who follow this Blog — even more specifically, to Christians who are eligible to vote but have not yet done so.

Quick Recap Of Part 1

To summarize key points from Part 1 [detailed statistics were presented there:]

  • The upcoming election is NOT about choosing between two PEOPLE. It’s about choosing between two diametrically opposite IDEOLOGIES.
  • Christians CAN actually dictate the outcome of this election — easily if only 15% of them who didn’t vote in 2016 vote this year, and by a landslide if all who didn’t vote in 2016 vote this year [backed up in Part 1 with facts and statistics that show why I believe very strongly that they SHOULD.
  • Polls and media coverage now are almost identical to what they were at this point in 2016 — Biden [Clinton in 2016] is “in the lead,” a shoo-in, no possible path to 270 for Trump, it’ll be a landslide for Biden [Clinton in 2016.]

Election Math In The Current Paradigm

Quick Refresher About “Paradigm”

Perhaps the most dominant underlying theme in all of my posts to this blog — and of the host website I created as the platform for it — is that there is a major paradigm shift underway in this country [“paradigm” being “a philosophical or theoretical framework within which theories, laws, and generalizations are formulated” according to Merriam-Webster — i.e., “the way things work.”] Although the shift is occurring less rapidly than I thought it was in 2016, it is very real, and its pace is accelerating rapidly now. In a paradigm shift [a phrase coined by Joel Arthur Barker in his 1992 book Future Edge,] the Current Paradigm is rapidly deteriorating to a point at which problems are not being solved and new things aren’t gaining enough support to get done [even when there is voiced bipartisan support for them.] As soon as that begins [at least a decade ago in terms of how our Government operates,] a New Paradigm begins to form, and it becomes more and more effective until its effectiveness is better than that of the Current Paradigm, at which point the Current Paradigm’s demise is clear and the New Paradigm becomes the Current Paradigm. This concept is explained more fully at A Major Paradigm Shift Underway [written in 2016, but the principle is still the same.]

Current-Paradigm Election Math

Many people — including many Christians — have allowed their voting decisions to be driven either by their personal desire to make an ideological statement about a particular issue or their personal like or dislike of one of the two candidates. In principle, this sounds at least OK, maybe even good. For example, several million votes for the Green Party candidate would show that there are a lot of people who want our country to do a better job in controlling Climate Change. Or, voting for Candidate A because the voter dislikes Candidate B’s persona gives the voter the personal satisfaction of not having voted for a person he/she dislikes personally.

Obviously, a person in the latter category is explicitly voting in support of the platform of Candidate A’s party even if he/she identifies more closely with the platform of Party B — the apparent rationale being that his/her dislike of Candidate B is stronger than his/her identification with either of the two major-party platforms. 

Unfortunately, in our Current Paradigm, when a person uses his/her vote to “make a statement” rather than to consciously and deliberately support one of the two major-party platforms [i.e., votes for a minor-party candidate, writes in somebody else, or doesn’t vote at all,] he/she is actually unwittingly voting in support of either the Democrat platform or the Republican platform. Even more unfortunately, he/she won’t know which platform he/she supported until the election is over and the results are analyzed. This is true because these votes always reduce one of the two major-party candidate’s chances of winning and increase the other’s.

This chart depicts what I’ve said here graphically: Decision Logic 2020. For anybody who’s interested in more quantitative evidence, see Decision Logic 2020 — The Math or just take my word for the following statements that are confirmed by that graphic:

  • After the results of the election are tabulated and certified, one of the following environments will prevail for at least two of the next four years, possibly all four of them [regardless of how many “making a statement” votes are cast:] 1) Trump is president and the legislative branch remains as is, b) Trump is president and one or both legislative branch majorities change, c) Biden is president and the legislative branch remains as is, or d) Biden is president and one or both legislative branch majorities change.
  • In any of these environments, the PLATFORM of the president’s party will guide this country’s policies for at least the next four years.
  • Which of the two major-party candidates was harmed by the sum of all the “making a statement” votes described above will be evident.

Coming In Part 3

In Part 3, I’ll point out what I believe are the contrasts between the two platforms that are the most critical from a Christian perspective, and why this election is a time for Christians to rise up and “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all entrusted to the saints” [Jude 3 NKJV/NIV — “the saints” are us]. I’ll close that post with an earnest plea for all Christians to pray diligently about this decision and seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit in making it.

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.


A Choice Between Two Futures — Part 3

[This is Part 3 of 3 — Click here to read Parts 1 and 2: Part 1 Part 2]

As I explained in Part 1, this series of posts is specifically addressed to Christians who follow this Blog — even more specifically, to Christians who are eligible to vote but have not yet done so.

In this Part 3, I’ll point out what I believe are the contrasts between the two platforms that are the most critical from a Christian perspective, and why this election is a time for Christians to rise up and “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all entrusted to the saints” [Jude 3 NKJV/NIV — “the saints” are us]. In wrapping up this series, I’ll include at the end of this post some thoughts I am asking all Christians to seriously consider and pray about.

Two Diametrically Opposite Ideologies

I hope by now I have clearly shown that the upcoming election is NOT about choosing between two PEOPLE. It’s about choosing between two diametrically opposite IDEOLOGIES. That should be evident to anybody who will simply look at the stark contrast between the Democrat and Republican platforms. Anybody, particularly any Christian, who thinks this contrast doesn’t matter needs to 1) read both party platform documents in detail [here are links to each: Republican Democrat,] 2) IGNORE all ads from both parties and “news” shows with panels of experts and latest polls, and 3) look at montages of video clips showing what each party’s members say in response to questions about issues that are [or should be] of particular interest to Christians. Here are some of the areas in which contrasts are the clearest:

  • Sanctity of Human Life
  • LGBT Issues [e.g., Redefining Marriage, Religious Liberty Concerns, Transgender Bathrooms in Schools, and the International Abortion and LGBT Agenda]
  • Conscience Rights in Healthcare
  • God in Government
  • The Supreme Court
  • Education
  • Sex Education
  • Social Experiments in the Military
  • Terrorism

As I began listing the differences I was finding as I read both platform documents in detail [Democrat 92 pages, Republican 67 pages,] I began to realize that my list was looking remarkably similar to a tabular comparison produced by Family Research Council I had seen earlier this year. Although the wording in that tabulation would be viewed as “slanted” to the Right by some readers of this Blog, it nonetheless depicts the contrast accurately because many of the entries are direct quotes from the platform documents. So I’ll simply provide a link to the FRC document instead of creating a similar document myself. Please view the tabular comparison at this link: FRC Party Platform Comparisons. Another excellent resource is Election 2020: Two Visions For America, published by the Billy Graham Evangelical Association. On pages 19-22, this guide has a tabular comparison similar to the FRC document, adding some additional issues: Federal Judges, Economic Empowerment And Poverty, National Defense, and Israel And Jerusalem. Please view this document at this link: BGEA Party Platform Comparisons.

Keep in mind that millions of voters in this country [enough to swing an election one way or the other] are what one popular radio talk show host calls “low information voters,” an alarming number of whom can’t answer simple questions like “Who is our Vice President?,” “What are the three branches of our government?,”  or “How many Supreme Court Justices are there?” That, coupled with the fact that upwards of 90% of traditional “news” media is controlled by six corporations whose leadership is liberally biased [see this post of mine from 2017: Fake News Or Just Meaningless News?] and almost 20% of adult Americans get most of their “news” not through these sources but through Social Media [see Social Media Influence,] means Christians have far less influence than they could. So what could change that?

Circles Of Influence

A well-documented phenomenon for many years is that if any of us picks any person at random, we are connected to that person in some way through only nine steps through his/her and our mutual connections with other people. In recent years, the consensus among those who ponder such matters is that social media has reduced the number of steps to less than six. The validity of this concept is very succinctly described in this video [less than 3 minutes:] Six Degrees Of Separation. This Degrees Of Separation concept can by extension be viewed as Circles Of Influence — i.e., the number of people one person can influence simply by expressing his/her opinion to his/her close contacts. This is actually the “engine” driving protests and demonstrations — and unfortunately, the devolvement of them into rioting and looting — we see in the media every day. If all born again Christians would pray fervently and follow the guidance of the Holy Spirit regarding the upcoming election — and if so led as they do so, include dialog on this within their Circles Of Influence — that same “engine” could literally drive the election’s outcome.

In Closing …

I have appreciated the feedback I’ve gotten from this series of posts, and am grateful for the opportunity writing it afforded me to disseminate what I believe very strongly is important and crucial information at this point in our country’s history. I’ll close the series with these thoughts. …

  • An earnest plea for all Christians who’ve read this series to take what I’ve written into account, pray diligently about their own voting decision, and seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit in making it.
  • A request that all Christians seriously consider being a part of utilizing the Circles Of Influence concept I mentioned above — i.e., post your thoughts to your FaceBook page, send Tweets, etc.
  • A request that all Christians who have heretofore been somewhat ambivalent about what they have viewed as “just politics” — even to the point of allowing themselves to view their voting decisions as personal decisions only and not affecting others — to begin finding ways to continuously keep themselves more aware of cultural/social [which in many ways are spiritual] developments in our country, like the “evolution” over decades that led to the current situation.

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.


A Choice Between Two Futures — Part 1

When I introduced this web site in 2016 and began publishing blog posts from it, I said that although I am a Christian and form my opinions from that value system and worldview, I wanted to avoid routine use of  phraseology that my non-Christian readers might view as “religious dogma” and use terminology that would pique the interest of any reader, Christian or not. I haven’t been publishing posts to this blog as frequently for the past couple of years, but at this point I feel that I should address this post and the others I am planning between now and November 3rd specifically to Christians — even more specifically, to Christians who are eligible to vote but have not yet done so.

In this post — Part 1 — I’ll outline the message I feel is important for any Christian reading this post to hear, and why I feel compelled to share that message.

The upcoming election is NOT about choosing between two PEOPLE. It’s about choosing between two diametrically opposite IDEOLOGIES. More on that later. For now, l’ll state up front the “bottom line” — that Christians CAN actually dictate the outcome of this election. In subsequent parts over the next couple of weeks, I’ll back up that statement — not with my opinion but with facts and statistics that show why I believe very strongly that they SHOULD.

The “Bottom Line”

Only 40% of American adults are “born again Christians” [as that classification is defined by the highly respected Barna Group.] That percentage of people of voting age is 102,080,149 people, but only 58% [59,206,486] of them actually voted in 2016. If you consider that sad fact in context with the fact that the average margin of victory in the last three second-term presidential elections was 5,398,610, it is obvious that born-again Christians can EASILY dictate the outcome of this election if 1) all of those who voted in 2016 vote this year and 2) as few as 15% of all who say they are “born again” and did not vote in 2016 vote this year [if all born again Christians vote this year, and do so after much prayer and following the  guidance of the Holy Spirit, the result would be a landslide for the winning party, and the world would see God’s will unfolding clearly and visibly.]

But what about the polls? Isn’t the election outcome already set? The short answer is “No, it ain’t over ‘til it’s over” in Yogi Berra’s words. At this point in 2016, Clinton was ahead of Trump in most major polls [RCP average: 5.6%] just as Biden is now [RCP average: 9.0%.] In “battleground” states, the margin was/is much tighter [Clinton by 5.0%, Biden by 4.5%.] Media coverage was very similar to what it is now [Clinton (now Biden) is a shoo-in, no possible path to 270 for Trump, it’ll be a landslide for Clinton (now Biden.)]

Why I’m Posting These Thoughts

God is sovereign, and “[His] thoughts are not [our] thoughts, nor are [our] ways [His] ways, for as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are [His] ways higher than [our] ways, and [His] thoughts than [our] thoughts” [Isaiah 55:8-9 NKJV.] His will is something none of us can predict — or even assume based on our interpretation of His Word. So I’m not trying to say which outcome of this election would be in line with His will, because that would simply be my opinion. What I do feel strongly about is that I need to point out to anyone who will read what I write the stark contrasts between the options before us — and that it’s NOT “just politics” or “about which of two people is more likable personally;” it’s about recognizing the moral choices [as expressed in the PARTY PLATFORMS] we have before us.

So my goals in writing this series of posts are …

  • To show the stark contrast between the Democrat and Republican platforms. Anybody, particularly any Christian, who thinks this contrast doesn’t matter needs to 1) read both party platform documents in detail [here are links to each: Republican Democrat,] 2) IGNORE all ads from both parties and “news” shows with panels of experts, and 3) look at montages of video clips showing what each party’s members say in response to questions about issues that are [or should be] of particular interest to Christians.
  • To demonstrate that Christians actually have the power to dictate the outcome of this election. It’s not rocket science.
  • To show that from a Christian perspective, the only thing that matters in terms of one’s vote — or decision not to vote — is with what one is aligning him/herself and what statement he/she is making through his/her decision.

Coming In Subsequent Parts

In Part 2, I’ll give a quick overview of “election math” under the current paradigm in this country, and why “protest votes” [voting for minor candidates, writing in somebody else, or not voting at all] are actually unwitting votes in support of either the Democrat platform or the Republican platform — but the voter won’t know which platform he/she supported until the election is over and the results are analyzed. This is true because these votes always reduce one candidate’s chances of winning and increase the other’s. Since I wrote extensively on this topic in 2016, I’ll probably include links to some of my posts back then.

In Part 3, I’ll point out what I believe are the contrasts between the two platforms that are the most critical from a Christian perspective, and why this election is a time for Christians to rise up and “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all entrusted to the saints” [Jude 3 NKJV/NIV — “the saints” are us]. I’ll close that post with an earnest plea for all Christians to pray diligently about this decision and seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit in making it.

(1) The Barna Group identifies “Born Again Christians” as “people who have made a personal commitment to Jesus Christ that is still important in their life today1 and who also indicate that they believe when they die they will go to Heaven because they have confessed their sins and have accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior.”

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.


75 Years Ago Today …

38C01AEE-98DD-469B-9C2E-8F17CD5315F2P3-59 1

Seventy-five years ago today — D-Day, June 6, 1944 — the Allies landed around 156,000 troops in Normandy, 73,000 of whom were American.  That successful invasion was a key turning point in quelling Adolph Hitler’s quest for world domination.

It would do us all some good to put ourselves in the place of the person who took the first picture shown above [sequence is left to right]. Knowing that in the next few seconds the door would swing down and we’d see the next scene, we’d be acutely aware that our very-near-term future could be the path depicted by the third and fourth scenes.

As I mentioned in my recent post on Memorial Day, in all of many international travels my wife and I have had the privilege of enjoying over the past twenty-plus years, seeing the Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial [above pic taken by me] and nearby Omaha Beach [the worst of the landing areas where scenes like the photo sequence above unfolded that day] was one of the most memorable and moving experiences for me. The cemetery covers 172.5 acres and contains 9,388 graves.

I highly recommend watching this video clip [a little less than six minutes] of the opening scenes of Saving Private Ryan [warning — very unpleasant imagery:] Clip From Saving Private Ryan. I was never in the military, but I expect that part of that film depicts about as accurately as possible the carnage suffered on our behalf by thousands of our fellow Americans — and thousands of citizens of the other Allied nations — on D-Day. We should never forget what they did for us.

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.

img_7026Charles M Jones

Charles M. Jones

 

 

A Different Kind Of Post for Me

imageSome people, even some of my Christian friends, who follow this Blog and/or follow me on FaceBook or Twitter may not appreciate this particular post — because they don’t “like” our President, or because they think Franklin Graham has become too “political.” Every day for well over a year, my prayers have included a lot of the exact phraseology Rev. Graham used in his prayer offered on 6/2/19 along with those of over 350 pastors and other Christian leaders who had called for that emphasis on that day [3 minute 50 second video: Prayer For Our President.]

I don’t “like” our President — i.e., his persona. Neither did I “like” his predecessor, and although many — maybe most — of his actions were inconsistent with my Worldview and Value System [see https://usaparadigm.com,] I prayed frequently for him, too. I must admit that my prayers for President Obama, although regular, were not as frequent as my prayers for President Trump have been — not because of our philosophical and ideological incongruities, but because the literal hate of President Trump by Democrats and the extremely bitter and even more polarized atmosphere that hate has created has shown me how much more prayer is needed at this time for whoever holds that office.

For anybody, particularly if you are not a Christian, reading this who may be offended already but has stuck with me to here, I ask that you read on, keeping in mind this quote from the Home Page of my www.USAparagpdigm.com web site:

“I will say up front that I am an Evangelical “Born Again” Christian, and it would be impossible for me to express my thoughts from the perspective of any other value system and worldview.  I have, however, attempted to avoid wording that would be overly tedious to those not sharing my views, and I honestly hope that nothing here prevents them from objectively reading the content on this site’s pages, and the content of my blog posts, and deciding for themselves whether any of that content has value for them.”

The polarization in our government that has worsened by orders of magnitude since Mr. Trump’s election has made me realize how much we need three things: 1) leaders in government who are willing to break with “accepted norms” and quit “going with the flow,” focusing on what is needed in our country and getting things done rather than only on getting re-elected; 2) Christian leaders who are willing to speak out, without formally endorsing any particular leader or candidate or party, on issues that undermine our faith; and 3) many people who will pray regularly along the lines of the above-mentioned prayer by Franklin Graham regardless of who is President.

I am thankful that in President Trump we have the first, and in Christian leaders like Franklin Graham and the 350+ pastors and other leaders who joined together in support of his call to prayer for our President on June 2, we have the second. My prayer is that the 400,000+ views of Rev. Graham praying for our President will grow to tens of millions who will see the bigger picture for our country and begin praying regularly for him in that way [thereby becoming the third.]

President John Adams wisely observed that “we have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. . . . Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other” [President John Adams.] Almost all politicians say they are religious and that they pray. In today’s climate, what we each need is wisdom to compare what they say to a) what they do and b) their Worldview / Value System [the latter is easily discernible by simply looking at the policies they support.]

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.

img_7026Charles M Jones

Charles M. Jones

This Memorial Day …

P3-59 1

This Memorial Day, let us all be thankful that a generation of Americans paid a huge price to preserve the freedom we all enjoy.

“In America, you don’t fight because you hate what’s in front of you, you fight because you love what’s behind you.” Major Pete Hegseth, CEO of Concerned Veterans for America.

In all of many international travels my wife and I have had the privilege of enjoying over the past twenty-plus years, this scene in Normandy, along with a view of nearby Omaha Beach, was one of the most memorable and moving for me. I shudder to think what those who lie beneath these grave markers in Normandy would think of many people in this country today who exercise the freedom they died for in such disrespectful and ungrateful ways.

My prayer is that somehow, we will come to our senses and realize what a dangerous and unsustainable path — fiscally, but more importantly, morally — we have been following in the past decade or two, and return to the values that made us the greatest nation on Earth.

Best wishes for a safe and enjoyable Memorial Day.

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.

img_7026Charles M Jones

Charles M. Jones

POTUSes 1 And 2 To Us

A friend of mine found a time capsule while hiking through a park on a recent trip to Washington DC and the surrounding area. He told me about a letter in it that was dated March 4, 1799 and addressed “To Whom It May Concern.” Because it was from our first two Presidents, I felt that I should share it with you right away. …

[Click This Link To Read The Letter]

I hope millions of Americans think of themselves as people “Whom it may concern.”

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.

img_7026 img_3358

Charles M. Jones

Move On Already!

IMG_0473How Democrats and the mainstream media are handling the Mueller Report reminds me of jokes we used to tell in my college days about another university that will herein remain unnamed … like “How many <bleep>s does it take to change a light bulb?” [answer: five — one to hold the bulb and four to turn the stepladder.] The one more applicable to Democrats and the media today, though, is “That <bleep> lost $100 on the Super Bowl, and then lost another $100 on the video replay.”

For over two years, they have bombarded us with “Trump colluded with the Russians,” demanded a recusal from Jeff Sessions because he had a brief conversation at a cocktail reception with a Russian official, demanded a Special Counsel, touted Bob Mueller as an excellent choice, and relentlessly predicted Trump was going down when Mueller’s report came out. When Barr’s summary said “no collusion,” he rapidly became the spawn of Satan [by confirming what Trump has been saying for two years,] Mueller’s integrity and reputation suddenly took a turn for the worse, and demands for the full unredacted report [which has no historical precedent] became the new mantra.

Back to the Super Bowl analogy. …

Enough already!  You lost $100 on the Investigate Everything game. Don’t keep beating that drum and lose another $100 on the video replay. Quit investigating and start legislating [governing.]

To repeat something I said in a recent post, “Personally, although I feel that Americans who have ruined the lives of other Americans for no other reason than to drive their political agendas need to be held accountable for their actions, I can’t just jump on the side of many of my fellow Republicans who seem to be pressing that issue too harshly. We have got to find a way to get off our completely polarized “horses” and get onto a train that’s headed down a more civilized and stable path.”

President Trump had the right to end what he has [rightfully, as it has turned out] called the Witch Hunt if he had wanted to. He could have fired everyone, including Mueller, if he had wanted to. He had the right to use Executive Privilege to redact more of the Mueller Report [as President Clinton did with the Star Report.] He didn’t do any of that.

Focus On The Half Full View, Not The Half Empty View

During the two and a half years in which Democrats and the mainstream media have pushed this take-Trump-down agenda, President Trump’s many accomplishments have taken a back seat in media coverage — which means that the real motive of the take-Trump-down agenda has been successful. I’ve said in previous posts that I don’t “like” our President personally [i.e., his public persona and how he conducts himself.]  But whether I “like” him or not doesn’t matter. Retrospectively, in the future, the success or failure of his presidency won’t be based on how many people “liked” him. It will be based on a net composite assessment of his effectiveness [or lack thereof] on domestic and foreign policy matters from a long-term perspective. So what are the accomplishments that have taken a back seat? For starters, here are just a few. …

The Economy. Almost 4 million jobs created since the election [400,000 manufacturing jobs, which are growing at the fastest rate in more than three decades.] More Americans are now employed than ever recorded before in our history. Economic growth in some quarters has hit 4.2 percent. New unemployment claims recently hit a 49-year low. Median household income has hit the highest level ever recorded. African-American, Hispanic-American, and Asian-American unemployment has recently achieved the lowest rate ever recorded. Women’s unemployment recently reached the lowest rate in 65 years. Youth unemployment has recently hit the lowest rate in nearly half a century. Lowest unemployment rate ever recorded for Americans without a high school diploma. Veterans’ unemployment recently reached its lowest rate in nearly 20 years. Almost 3.9 million Americans have been lifted off food stamps since the election. U.S. manufacturers optimistic about the future has been as high as 95% — the highest ever. Signed the biggest package of tax cuts and reforms in history. After tax cuts, over $300 billion poured back in to the U.S. in the first quarter alone. Small businesses now have the lowest top marginal tax rate in more than 80 years. Record number of regulations eliminated. Foreign Policy and International Relationships. Increased our coal exports by 60 percent; U.S. oil production recently reached all-time high. We are a net natural gas exporter for the first time since 1957. NATO allies are spending $69 billion more on defense since 2016. Withdrew from the Iran Nuclear Deal. Moved U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. Issued Executive Order to keep open Guantanamo Bay. Concluded a historic Mexico-Canada-America Trade Deal to replace NAFTA. Imposed tariffs on China in response to China’s forced technology transfer, intellectual property theft, and their chronically abusive trade practices. Our National Character. Confirmed more circuit court judges than any other new administration. Confirmed Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Innovative Thinking. Process has begun to make the Space Force the 6th branch of the Armed Forces.

Move On Already!

A very popular radio talk show host constantly uses the term “low information voters” to describe Americans who know very little about what is going on in our country and are easily taken in by the claims of candidates with “charisma” or whose “promises” appeal to them, personally.  I honestly hope those Americans can also be counted among those of us who are fed up and want our leaders to grow up and lead, and govern.

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.

img_7026 Charles M Jones

Charles M. Jones

Your Lexicon Of Meaningless Campaign Jargon

 

As much is I hate to say it, the 2020 campaign was well underway at least 23 months before the election will be held, and the percentage of media time focused on it is already accelerating exponentially. I hate even more to say that “breather” periods in news and entertainment media are a thing of the past — i.e., those brief but refreshing periods when a person could just receive “news” content without every facet of it being expressed in political terms [I usually put “news” in quote marks because all “news” is a mixture of real news and fake news, and the consumer of it must decide which is which.] Even the small amount of network and cable entertainment that does not in its content have indirect if not blatant political undertones is disproportionately sponsored by political ads.

As I’ve heard the statements and remarks of candidates [both announced and not yet announced] in the rapidly-increasing cadre during speeches and interviews, I have developed a valuable screening tool for my my readers. The tool is a lexicon of words and phrases that will undoubtedly be used by many if not all candidates between now and Election Day. I’ll start with a brief description of how this valuable tool can be used to save you a lot of time and frustration, and then present the lexicon itself.

How To Use The Lexicon

This tool can save those who use it a lot of time and frustration if used properly. Simply memorize it or keep it handy in places where you access media. Whenever a candidate is speaking or writing, just watch for uses of words or phrases in the lexicon. If within the first minute or two the candidate uses as many as three of these words or phrases, there is no need to continue reading / listening / watching. The entire speech is a standard, carefully-worded political speech designed to gain support through the “charisma” the candidate and his/her donors believe can propel him/her into the office being sought. This same logic applies to a candidate’s responses to questions in an interview.

The Lexicon

Now, for the lexicon itself. Notes: 1) words and phrases in bold italics are “red flag” items [standard campaign terminology for standard politicians;] and 2) words and phrases enclosed in brackets [<>] are to be filled in by the reader.

Word / Phrase / Sentence Meaning
We need to put politics and party behind us and work together to solve problems. Put my party in full power and we’ll get things done — and they’ll be the right things.
I’m a <party name> because it best represents our values, but I have demonstrated that I can reach across the aisle to get consensus … I will make statements in public that present this image, but I will doggedly push my party’s agenda unless doing so would potentially adversely affect my reelection prospects — in which case I may at least attempt to negotiate with the other party.
[When asked what they consider a “loaded question …] The real question we should be asking ourselves is <anything to avoid a direct answer.> I ain’t fallin’ into that trap to give you sound bites that can be used against me, so I’ll use this free media time to pontificate and recite to your audience as many lines as possible from my party’s talking points script.
This is not a Democrat or a Republican issue; it’s an American issue. My party’s position on this issue is the right one, and best represents the interest of all Americans.
This not a political issue; it’s a moral issue. My party’s position on this issue is the right one, and best represents our morals.
This is not who we are. Whatever the other party’s position on this issue, ours is the exact opposite, and our position best depicts who we are as a country.
We need to drain the swamp [or we’re not finished draining the swamp.] Truly draining the swamp would mean getting rid of people like me, too, and that would not be good for the country. What we need is cooperation that leads to consensus. Reaching that noble goal in this election is doubtful, but elect me and I’ll at least try as long as doing so doesn’t jeopardize my party’s agenda or adversely affect my reelection in the election after this one.
We are the party of <inclusion, tolerance, healthcare, income equality, fair taxes, the middle class, motherhood and apple pie, …> We are the only party that espouses these [and other of the noblest] values. Put us in power and you’ll have them in your leadership. Put the other party in power and you won’t.
They are the party of homophobes, Islamaphobes, xenaphobes, misogynists, … . If you are among the victims dealing with these attitudes among “those people,” electing members of my party is the only way you can see them mitigated.

Well, there you have it. I may write some posts over the next — regrettably — twenty months with updates to this lexicon as the unfolding campaign reveals more items that should be included. Any such updates, as with this initial release, will be at no extra charge 😊, offered as a service to my country ✌️.

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.

img_7026 Charles M Jones

Charles M. Jones

 

Time To Govern More Effectively

img_3260If you agree very strongly with either the “Conservative” or the “Liberal” interpretation of the current post-Moeller-report environment in our country, I urge you to read this entire post for one simple reason — neither of these polarized views is 100% correct, and until we realize that, the environment of the past two and a half years is the “new normal” in America, and it will remain so until the Current Paradigm has officially died and the New Paradigm is in full gear [for those who have not routinely followed my Blog, see A Major Paradigm Shift Well Underway.]

Our leaders in both parties have wasted countless hours and dozens [at least — maybe scores] of millions of our dollars over at least the past four and a half [not just two and a half] years trying to find a “smoking gun” that clearly shows that the other party [the one that isn’t theirs] is guilty of … whatever.

It was encouraging to me over the past few days to hear even some of the most outspoken critics of our President say, through media channels that are clearly hostile toward him, that the fact that Mr. Moeller’s investigation found no reason to bring charges against Mr. Trump is a good thing for our country. Personally, although I feel that Americans who have ruined the lives of other Americans for no other reason than to drive their political agendas need to be held accountable for their actions, I can’t just jump on the side of many of my fellow Republicans who seem to be pressing that issue too harshly. We have got to find a way to get off our completely polarized “horses” and get onto a train that’s headed down a more civilized and stable path.

I’m not a pollster, but I honestly think the only people in this country who are pushing all this back-and-forth “Who dunnit?” bickering are politicians who apparently think it’s needed to get them re-elected, and the media pundits and their panels of “experts” who rely on eye-catching “breaking news” headlines for ratings. The rest of us are sick of it. I pray that our elected leaders in both parties will realize that it’s time to rise above all this and get on with doing what they were elected to do — govern effectively — and that they will ultimately show that they had the wisdom to strike the right balance between holding people accountable for actions that have unnecessarily harmed a lot of people while avoiding actions that are simply vindictive.

In 1858, Abraham Lincoln declared, “A house divided against itself cannot stand” [see Lincoln — 1858 for the full text of that speech, which I could argue is at least as important for us today as it was for our nation at that time.] Over 1,800 years earlier, Jesus Christ said “Every kingdom divided against itself is headed for destruction, and a house divided against itself falls” [Luke 11:17.] Anyone who thinks this country is not a “house divided against itself” must be in a bubble of some kind, shielded from anything going on around them.

In a 1948 speech to the House of Commons, Winston Churchill said “Those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it” [taken from words almost a half century earlier by George Santayana: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”] Under the auspices of Mr. Churchill’s wise advice, I’ll close with some quotes from our history that we should not forget. …

    • “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.” President John Adams
    • “However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled [people] will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.” President George Washington
    • “A democracy cannot survive as a permanent form of government. It can last only until its citizens discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority [who vote] will vote for the candidates promising the greatest benefits from the public purse, with the result that a democracy will always collapse from loose fiscal policies, always followed by a dictatorship.” Lord Thomas B. Macaulay, English Historian, Essayist and Statesman, 1800-1859 [in a  letter to an American friend on May 23, 1857.]
    • “A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.” George Bernard Shaw.
    • “In the end, the ultimate threat to the American republic will be America.  The problem is not with wolves at the door but termites in the floor.” Os Guinness
    • “The people are responsible for the character of their Congress. If that body be ignorant, reckless, and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness, and corruption.  If it be intelligent, brave, and pure, it is because the people demand these high qualities to represent them in the national legislature. … If the next centennial does not find us a great nation . . . it will be because those who represent the enterprise, the culture, and the morality of the nation do not aid in controlling the political forces.” President James Garfield

And then there’s the definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results [often unverifiably attributed to Albert Einstein; in reality the best attribution for this very wise statement should be Unknown.] We simply cannot continue doing the same thing. It isn’t working, has been working less and less effectively for at least a decade, and will ultimately fail.

Thanks for reading this post, and if you regularly follow my Blog, for that, too. Please consider sharing this or other posts with your friends, colleagues and associates.

img_7026 Charles M Jones

Charles M. Jones